Can you use dot points in selection criteria?
You should use dot points rather than paragraphs in your selection criteria responses. Your claims should be narrative in content rather than just a list of your skills. Dot (or bullet) points can be used where appropriate, but should always contain a description of a skill, and not just the skill on its own.
What is Star approach to selection criteria?
STAR stands for Situation, Task, Action, Result and applicants are told that they should write their selection criteria as follows: Situation: describe a work situation that you were faced with. Task: describe the task that you had to complete. Action: describe the action that you took to complete the task.
How long should selection criteria answers be?
How long should my selection criteria responses be?
- Keep it succinct and brief. More than 3/4 page per criterion is almost certainly too much.
- Conversely, you must give enough information to answer the question, so less than 1/3 to 1/2 page is probably too little.
- Waffle does not cut it.
How do you use the STAR method on a job application?
Using the STAR technique in a job interview
- describe the Situation and when did it take place.
- explain the Task and what was the objective.
- give details about the Action you took to achieve this.
- close with the Result of your action.
How do you write a Star Method?
‘STAR’ (Situation, Task, Action and Result) can help you provide a concise and effective answer to competency based questions. Situation – provide some brief details about the situation you were in when you used your competencies so that the reader can understand the context of the example.
How do you pass a Star interview?
Answering Interview Questions Using STAR
- Find a Suitable Example. The STAR interview method won’t be helpful to you if you use it to structure an answer using a totally irrelevant anecdote.
- Lay Out the Situation.
- Highlight the Task.
- Share How You Took Action.
- Dish Out the Result.
What is the criteria for a star?
The STAR criteria—Sufficiency, Typicality, Accuracy, and Relevance—are a handy means of evaluating content and deciding whether or not it is logically valid. Is there enough cited evidence to support the conclusion? Generally, only “strongly” and not “weakly” supported conclusions should be accepted.